iPhone 14: Leaks, Rumors and Release Date

There are still a few months to go before the 2022 iPhone 14 models will be ready to launch, but because there are some notable updates in the works for these devices, we've been hearing rumors about them since well before the iPhone 13 models even came out.

iPhone sizes are changing in 2022, and Apple is eliminating the 5.4-inch iPhone mini as it turned out to be unpopular with customers. After seeing lackluster iPhone mini sales, Apple is planning to focus on larger iPhone sizes for its flagship devices, and we're expecting to see a 6.1-inch iPhone 14, a 6.1-inch iPhone 14 Pro, a 6.7-inch iPhone 14 Max, and a 6.7-inch iPhone 14 Pro Max. Note that there will be no 5.4-inch iPhone 14 mini this year.

Since 2017, iPhones with Face ID have had a notch at the front to house all the necessary equipment for facial scanning, but that's set to change with the launch of the iPhone 14. The 2022 iPhone 14 Pro models are expected to eliminate the notch in favor of a new design. Rumors were all over the place for a bit, but it looks like Apple will go with some combination of a circular hole-punch cutout for the camera paired with a pill-shaped cutout to house to key Face ID components. This feature will unfortunately be limited to the Pro models, and the more affordable iPhone 14 models will continue to feature a standard notch.

We are not expecting any significant design changes this year, but the camera bumps for the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Pro could get thicker, with the Pro's bump growing in size more notably. Apple is expected to introduce new color options, perhaps adding a purple shade.

The iPhone 14 Pro models may feature a titanium frame instead of a stainless steel frame, and redesigned speaker and microphone grilles are a possibility. Apple could also use a new vapor chamber thermal system that will keep the iPhone cooler to minimize the impact of faster chips and 5G connectivity.

New iPhones always include camera improvements, and the iPhone 14 is no exception. There will be improvements to the Ultra Wide camera, and there's a possibility that Apple will introduce a "periscope" zoom lens that allows for much greater optical zoom, but it's still not yet clear if this will come in 2022 or 2023. The Pro iPhone models are expected to get 48-megapixel cameras and 8K video recording capabilities, but these features will not be available on the standard iPhone 14 models.

Rumors suggest that the iPhone 14 models are likely to continue to use the same A15 chip that was introduced in the iPhone 13 series, while the iPhone 14 Pro models receive an updated A16 chip. This would mark the first time that the Pro iPhone models get a faster chip, with Apple perhapps going this route to cut down on costs and also because of ongoing supply issues.

play

Apple is expected to use Qualcomm's Snapdragon X65 chip, which is the first 10-gigabit 5G modem with faster connectivity speeds and connectivity improvements. Alongside the X65, Apple is expected to introduce new satellite-based emergency features that will let users send texts in emergency situations and report accidents with no cellular coverage.

Apple iPhone’s design – from the the 1st generation to the iPhone 12

January 9, 2007, Steve Jobs announces the iPhone in San Francisco

Apple iPhone – history of a design revolution

Summary: On the occasion of the presentation of the iPhone 7, we have prepared a short coverage of the history of what is arguably one of the most revolutionary electronic devices ever made – the Apple iPhone – from the first generation to the iPhone 12. We will describe its design, how it was conceived and developed by its creators – Steve Jobs, Jonathan Ive, and the Apple Design Team – the design of its graphic interface, its precursors, its evolution over time, and finally we’ll go over why this small mobile phone has possibly changed the design of consumer electronics forever.

Update – from the iPhone X to 12

In September 2017, Apple introduced the iPhone X (or “ten”), a model that pushed the distinctive concept and design of the device to the limit. The 11th generation of the iPhone featured a larger 5.8-inch touch-screen, based on an OLED display manufactured by Samsung, and a design in which all front physical buttons were removed and, apart from a thin rounded bezel made of stainless steel, the whole front of the device coincided with its enormous display.

Following the latest trends, Apple equipped the iPhone X, and its iOS 11 operating system, with many new functions, including facial recognition, an updated 3D touch, interactive animated emoji (called Animoji), and more of this kind of stuff.

Compared with the previous iPhones, the X was larger, more expensive, and more “funny” than ever.

This didn’t come as a surprise since, as I point out in the paragraph “When less is really much less” just below, the very design concept of the iPhone doesn’t leave much space for a formal evolution other than removing everything apart from the display (maybe leaving some “luxurious” detail such as a shiny metal bezel around it to justify its “exclusive” price).

This is not bad per se, as long as you introduce real innovation under the hood and try to truly make the device as more useful as possible.

The 2017 iPhone X, source: Apple

The subsequent generations, the iPhones 11 and 12, didn’t change the paradigm; the displays grew larger, up to the 6.7 inches of the iPhone12 Pro Max, and the bezels became thinner.

A notable exception is the iPhone 12 Mini, presented in November 2020.

As the name suggests, the mini is a relatively small and cheap mobile phone with a 5.4” display, whose size and look go back under many aspects to those of the…iPhone 4 and 5.

Therefore, we have now two divergent lines; on one side, the huge “max” iPhones heading for phablet-like dimensions and, on the other side, the smaller “mini” iPhones aimed to finally (re)enter in our pockets…

The iPhone 12 Pro Max (left, 6.7”) and iPhone 12 mini (right, 5.4”) side by side. Image Inexhibit.

Introduction

When Steve Jobs presented to the public the first iPhone in San Francisco’s Moscone Center, on January 9, 2007, many among Apple’s competitors were simply shocked.

Until then, the high-end mobile phone market was dominated by RIMS’ BlackBerry devices. Clearly aimed to businessmen and creative professionals, the keys of their success were a relatively large and complete (considering the device’s size) integrated QWERTY keyboard with which writing and exchanging e-mails, SMS, and short text presentations with the rest of the world was much easier than through those of more simple, and cheaper, mobile phones.

Therefore, it’s easy to imagine how big a surprise was to see Jobs presenting a device with no physical keyboard at all, replaced by an enormous (at least at those times) 3.5” touchscreen enclosed by a thin aluminum and black plastic frame.

January 9, 2007, Steve Jobs compares the iPhone with other high-end mobile phones of that time

From a telephone to (almost) a computer

The use of touchscreens to combine interaction and visualization into a single device was not that new. It was indeed a solution already adopted, for example, in state-of-the-art exhibition design to provide a more natural interaction and access to content to that heterogeneous assortment of people, from kids to octogenarians, who frequent museums and exhibitions. Nevertheless, before 2007, it was a technology only marginally implemented in a small device which many still considered, above all, only a telephone.

For truth’s sake, in 1994, IBM released a “monumental” touch-only mobile phone, the Simon Personal Communicator, an eight-inch long apparatus weighing some 18 ounces; yet, Simon had a brief and ephemeral success and was discontinued after six months only.

Released in 1994, the IBM Simon was the first touchscreen-only mobile phone ever produced. Despite its modest success, it is generally considered the precursor of all smartphones

A touchscreen-based interactive exhibit in a museum, 2002, photo Bianchini & Lusiardi architects

Apple’s idea was to use the phone display, a capacitive touchscreen that could be used with the bare fingers, as its main input device; thus completely removing the physical keyboard and maximizing the size of the display itself to improve the user’s experience and provide a portable tool suitable for full video reproduction, listening music, entertainment, web navigation, GPS navigation, and so on, and essentially transforming a phone into a miniaturized mobile computer, albeit quite limited in many functions. (I will discuss this later on)

Apple and its most talented designer Jonathan “Jony” Ive (b. 1967) were working on keyboard-less touchscreen-based mobile devices since the late 1980s, with conceptual designs such as the Macintosh Folio and an unlucky product such as the Apple Newton, released in 1993.

Yet, those early projects failed, mainly because touch technology and the computational power of the microprocessors required, necessarily tiny, were not enough developed at the time; for example, the Apple Newton still required a stylus and lacked sufficient graphics power to be considered something more than a Personal Digital Assistant.

The Apple Newton, the first product designed by Jonathan Ive in Cupertino, 1993, photo Jim Abeles

Macintosh Folio, prototype (c. 1992), photo by Rick English

A decisive step ahead was taken in the early 2000s, after the return of Steve Jobs at the helm of Apple in 1997. Jobs realized the potential of keyboard-less multi-purpose mobile devices and started thinking “to put a great computer in a book that you can carry around with you and learn how to use in 20 minutes”. This will later become the iPad, yet Jobs decided to release a mobile telephone first.

Is the iPhone a computer?

No, despite what Jobs said, it isn’t.

It’s not a matter of computational power, an iPhone 7 is way more powerful than the Pentium-based PC I used in the mid-’90s to do (not too complex) 3D modeling and hi-res video-editing. The problem is the Human-Computer interaction; the screen of a smartphone is just too small and its input system (the screen itself) too limited in its capabilities to make the iPhone a device apt to be used with professional applications, such as a true photo-editing software like Photoshop, a CAD, or even a basic word processor.

Therefore, it makes no sense to use an iPhone (and even an iPad, to some extent) at work, other than as an internet navigation device, a point-and-shoot photo-camera, or a simple tool to write a 100-word text. Of course, you can actually do some professional work with it – for over three decades, Andy Warhol did magnificent photos with a rather basic Polaroid -, but you can’t run a single professional software on a smartphone and even if you could install, say, Photoshop on an iPhone, using it proficiently would be out of the question, due to the tiny screen and the intrinsic limitation of touchscreens as an input device when excellent precision is required.

Now, I think I should point out what, to me, a computer is. Dropping the obsolete distinction between personal computers and workstations, which is no longer valid since the end of the workstation-era in the early 2000s, a general-purpose computer is an affordable electronic device – you can use at home or for work, indifferently – that can seamlessly run a broad range of software applications, including professional ones.

This was the conceptual backbone of the digital revolution that, during the ’80s, made computational power accessible to (almost) all in the western world, moving computers from high-end research laboratories to our homes. A revolution which, incidentally, was triggered by people such as Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak.

Smartphones are essentially portable communication and entertainment devices and, as long as their physical limits are not overcome, they will always be no more than that. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, as long as you know it.

I suspect that Jobs was perfectly aware of that and that his definition of “a great computer” was more marketing than a real conviction. Indeed, you can’t honestly learn to use a “real” computer in twenty minutes.

Jonathan Ive and the design of the iPhone

The iPhone project was started in 2004, with the code name “Project Purple”.

Conceptual sketches of the first iPhone, made by Jonathan Ive and the Apple design team, show a device very similar to the actual product, only a bit more round-edged and with a relatively smaller display.

The first iPhone was a small object, shaped like a block of bar soap and with a weight of 135 grams. Besides the glass screen, the phone’s chassis was mostly made in aluminum and “embraced” the display to protect it from accidental side impacts.

Jonathan Ive and Apple Design Team, conceptual sketches of the iPhone, date unknown

The only evident physical input device was (and still is) a frontal large round menu button. There were other four buttons on the phone’s sides to regulate volume, control phone calls, mute the phone ringing, and for other functions.

Since the phone didn’t have a lid or a cover, a proximity sensor was required to stop the touchscreen input functions when the user brought it near the face during a call. Other sensors – such as an accelerometer and, later, a gyroscope, were included to give the device the capability to recognize movement and relative orientation in the space.

Apple iPhone, first-generation model, image courtesy of Apple Inc.

Ive has never denied the influence German designer Dieter Rams had on him.

With a creative background based on the functional design developed at the Bauhaus school in the early decades of the 20th century, Rams (b. 1932) is famous for the products he conceived for the German company Braun during the Fifties, the Sixties, and the Seventies; as well as for his academic work at the Ulm School of Design (Hochschule für Gestaltung Ulm), including the development of his Ten Points of Good Design, before the school closed in 1968.

“Good design is innovative. Good design must be useful. Good design is aesthetic design. Good design makes a product understandable. Good design is honest. Good design is unobtrusive. Good design is long-lasting. Good design is consistent in every detail. Good design is environmentally friendly. And last but not least, good design is as little design as possible” (The Ten points of Good Design – Dieter Rams)

It is a matter of fact that Braun’s designs and principles indubitably influenced the unique design of many of Apple’s products, such as the iPod, the iPad, the iMac, the Mac Pro, and, of course, the iPhone.

Left: Braun T3 pocket radio, 1958; right: a first-generation Apple iPod, 2001

Dieter Rams

However, due to its apparent simplicity, Ive’s iPhone was possibly less suitable to express the influence of Rams’ previous designs than, say, the iPod. Nevertheless, it was perfect to showcase some of his ten principles.

A device in which the complexity of the visible physical component was reduced to a minimum was indeed an ideal “playground” to push conceptual points such as detail consistency and the exhibition of “as little design as possible” to an unprecedented level in a consumer electronic product, even for a design-oriented manufacturer like Job’s Apple.

“Steve and I spent months and months working on a part of a product that, often, nobody would ever see, nor realize was there” (Jonathan Ive)

Jonathan Ive and Steve Jobs in 2005, image courtesy of Apple Inc.

Technical drawings of the iPhone 5, image courtesy of Apple Inc.

The son of a British silversmith Ive bases his approach to industrial design on a profound knowledge of manufacturing processes as much as it does on pure design skills. When you push the apparent simplicity of an object to that extent, God is even more in the detail.

“Objects and their manufacture are inseparable. You understand a product if you understand how it’s made” (Jonathan Ive)

“When you think about your iPhone, it’s probably the object that you use most in your life. It’s the product that you have with you all the time. Along with the experience of actually using it, what makes iPhone 5 so unique is how it feels in your hand, the material it’s been made with, the remarkable precision with which is been built.” (…)

“The body is made from a single piece of machined aluminum. The whole thing is polished first to a mirror finish and then is very finely textured, except for the Apple logo. The chamfers are cut with diamond-tipped cutters. The cutters don’t usually last very long, so we had to figure out a way of mass-manufacturing long-lasting ones. The camera cover is sapphire crystal. Look at the details around the sim-card slot. It’s extraordinary!” (Ive talking about the iPhone 5 in 2010)

Interaction design and the “skeuomorphic” graphic interface

To develop a so innovative product was technically a very demanding effort required to combine a completely new physical design with a revolutionary (for a mobile phone) user interface, which was showing many similarities with those of the coeval desktop and laptop computers.

The concept beyond the iPhone UI was that you need different inputs depending on the applications you are using, therefore a fixed physical keyboard is too functionally rigid and space-wasting for a smartphone; it would be therefore much better to replace it with a flexible “virtual” interface which adapts to the user’ needs and behaviors.

This was already done with computers, using an icon-based graphic interface and a mouse, but in the iPhone, the mouse was replaced by a touchscreen. Furthermore, the “large” size of the display allowed the use of applications, such as the Safari internet browser, almost identical to those installed in full-size computers (hitherto, smartphones included very simplified “baby” web browsers).

The operating system was indeed a stripped-down version of the OS-X adopted in Apple’s Macintosh of the time. Yet, the peculiar input system of the iPhone required the development of a completely-new gesture-based interface, and the introduction of innovative elements, such as the multi-touch technology we are so much accustomed to today.

iPhone’s multi-touch and multi-finger gesture sequence, image courtesy of Apple Inc.

The graphic design of the iPhone interface was based on those principles of skeuomorphism.

All digital interfaces developed by Apple since the introduction of the Macintosh featured indeed graphic elements mimicking real-life ones: a digital clock which looks like a good old alarm-clock, the camera icon which mimics a glass lens, the icon of the digital newspapers’ folder which resembles a wooden bookcase, and so on. This skeuomorphism and Steve Jobs always had a preference for it, deeming it more “natural” and intuitive for most users, at least during the transition between an analog and a digital society.

Comparison between the home screens (also known as “springboard” ) of the OS1 (left, 2007) and OS9 in a 6 Plus (right, 2014)

Yet, Ive never refused to admit he dislikes skeuomorphism, and subtly introduced a cleaner graphic style in elements such as the iPhone’s calculator which, again, is a tribute to Rams’ Braun ET44 and ET66 pocket calculators. In the last years, especially since the release of IOS 7, Apple is oriented to abandon skeuomorphism for a more simple, “flat” graphic design.

left: Braun ET66 pocket calculator (1987); right: calculator app in the iPhone (2007)

The evolution of the iPhone design from the first generation to the 7 series

Over time, also an innovative design has to evolve, especially in a restless market such as that of consumer electronics.

Yet, the iPhone substantially retained the basic elements conceived by Jobs and Ive in the early 2000s. Of course, compared to the first generation, the iPhone 7 is thinner, more powerful, more affordable, a superior graphic, much greater hardware capabilities, and is easier to use.

Nevertheless, it is, to a large extent, the same design the 2007 model was.

From this point of view, the biggest difference is that its display, from the 6 Plus model, is much larger, 5.5” versus 3.5” of the original model. There has been a great debate about this larger size – too large to be comfortable, in the opinion of many – which seems to contradicts Job’s idea of a little, simple, and handy device to fulfill the superficial desires of a mercurial market.

Yet, I deem it a natural and coherent evolution of the initial idea. Indeed, if you turn a phone into a multi-purpose and multi-media device, the screen size has to be as larger as possible to provide the user with a satisfying experience. Additionally, from a commercial point of view, it’s a matter of fact that larger devices make a better figure than smaller ones when placed side by side in a shop’s display.

Why the latest iPhone’s design is so similar to that of the first generation models is a different and more subtle matter, instead.

An iPhone 7 Plus, image courtesy of Apple inc.

When less is much less

The history of the iPhone project poses serious questions on the predictable evolution of the design of consumer electronic products and, more generally, on the sense of being a designer as we know it.

If the 2007 edition of the iPhone was the perfect embodiment of Ram’s principle that “good design is as little design as possible”, at the same time a device which, from a user’s point of view, largely coincides with its display doesn’t leave much room for evolution, at least of the object’s physical component.

You can use better materials, make it thinner and lighter, make it more durable and robust, of course, but not much more than this.

The key points of such an object’s design were indeed transferred into its display and under its virtual hood exactly at the moment, it was imagined for the first time.

In this case, the design of the graphic interface and the gesture recognition – and more generally what we may call the “immaterial” design – is as much important, if not more important – than the design of the physical object.

From touchscreen to touchless?

We could imagine a hypothetical future mobile device whose physical presence is virtually non-existent, a small carbon-fiber nutshell, or the like, which controls a large interactive virtual screen projected in the air or digitally painted on a thin, rollable, sheet of transparent plastic. While the technical development of such a device will be a matter for engineers, Its creative and aesthetic design will be just made of graphic, behavioral, and gestural interfaces.

A flexible OLED display presented by LG in 2014

I don’t know whether Rams and Steve Jobs would be happy with that possibility or not; yet, it could be not by chance that Ive, for some years now, is also in charge of the graphic and software interaction design of the iOS.

Apple iPhone: Insider Predicts Astonishing Design Change Coming

Will the iPhone 15 have a different socket on its base? Is this the end of the Lightning connecor? David Phelan

May 13 update below. This post was first published on May 11, 2022.

It looks like there’s a big change coming to the iPhone next year. One that, if you’d asked me about last year, I’d have said would never happen. Literally never.

But the claim comes from one of the most respected Apple observers, Ming-Chi Kuo from TFI Securities. So, it must be true, right? Well, maybe.

MORE FROM FORBES Apple Reveals Jaw-Dropping Upgrade For AirPods Pro 2

May 13 update. Here’s the thing: a couple of days ago, reliable analyst Ming-Chi Kuo came up with the most outlandish suggestion about a future iPhone: that it would switch from Apple’s beloved Lightning connector to the widely available USB-C. Ridiculous, you might have thought. When Hell freezes over, you could have said.

But now, another highly-thought of surveyor of the Apple scene, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, has weighed in.

He has added his own take on the situation but broadly agrees with Ming-Chi Kuo. Gurman says Apple is testing a USB-C version of the iPhone for release in 2023, yes, the iPhone 15, not this fall’s expected iPhone 14. He believes that this may be in part because of the European Union’s insistence that future gadgets such as phones should be equipped with USB-C. He also adds that if the law doesn’t pass, though I think it will, it’s possible Apple won’t switch to USB-C after all. Gurman rightly points out that the situation is complex. Switching to USB-C would mean that almost everyone would be able to use just one cable and charger for their iPhone, iPad Pro and MacBook Pro—as well as Android phones, tablets, Windows and Chrome PCs and more. Win-win, right? Eventually, but in the short term remember that lots of people use Lightning for charging their Mac mice, MagSafe Duo Charger and more. So, for a while, these people will have just as much confusion, if not more, than they do now. Technology is such that a bit of me believes that by the time everyone has switched to USB-C, there’ll be a whole new, backwards-incompatible connector developed. I mean, hasn’t Apple just re-introduced MagSafe for the MacBook Pro?

Of course, the fact that two rumors have arrived does not mean it’s going to happen. Of course not. But the fact that they’re both from such reliable analysts has to mean something.

Kuo claims, in a pair of tweets earlier today, that “My latest survey indicates that 2H23 new iPhone will abandon Lightning port and switch to USB-C port.”

In other words, the iPhone due to arrive in the second half of 2023, the one everybody is referring to as iPhone 15, will change one of the only things about the iPhone that hasn’t altered since the iPhone 5 was released in 2012: the Lightning connector.

Kuo claims it will be replaced with USB-C, the connector used on almost all Android phones, the iPad Pro, iPad Air, iPad mini and Mac laptops.

For those who don’t follow these things closely, it may not seem much but here’s why it is.

Apple has stuck rigorously to Lightning connectors for its iPhones and made clear that it did not think the move to USB-C was a good idea. Indeed, when the European Union said it was going to insist that electronic devices all used the same connector, that is, USB-C, to reduce electronic waste, Apple pushed back powerfully, explaining that it would reduce innovation.

It's true that the Lightning connector is slimmer than USB-C, so it gives Apple greater flexibility in design. Additionally, since so many households have Lightning cables and chargers, throwing all those away to switch to USB-C would create more waste, it’s been argued.

The expectation was that Apple would stick to Lightning for as long as possible and switch instead to a portless iPhone that would charge wirelessly, for instance.

Ming-Chi Kuo has come to the conclusion that USB-C is on its way to the iPhone through his latest supply chain survey, seeing a change in emphasis away from Lightning, it seems, with suppliers saying they are expecting boosts in USB-C orders.

Kuo points out that there are benefits to a switch to USB-C, such as better data transfer and charging speeds. He also notes that the final details are still dependent on support in iOS.

Could it be that increased pressure from the E.U. has helped change Apple’s mind? After all, if it is faced with either not selling Lightning products in Europe or making a version with USB-C for the E.U. then it makes more sense to move to USB-C globally.

If you’re skeptical about this report, I can’t blame you. The only thing I’d say is that this topic is something I’ve talked to Apple about repeatedly. I have certainly not heard anyone say they think USB-C would be right for the iPhone, but by the same token, I’ve noticed the opposition to such an idea has been a touch more muted recently. Though not enough for me to say this change is going to happen.

The other practical benefit for consumers is that suddenly there really would be only one connector type for gadgets and picking up the wrong charging plug or cable could, soon, become a thing of the past.

It’s an intriguing prospect, even if it seemed outlandish until, well, now. More as we have it.